Perception of Radio Not a Shared Problem
|
|
Don't suppose you've had a chance to listen to the five radio industry leaders who made an appearance at the New York Market Radio (NYMRAD) CEO Summit. If not, spend 58 minutes with the audio rolling in the background by using this link. Hear what's said to see if it resembles what is happening in your little corner of the radio world.
Before offering comments about this conversation among today's titans of radio, let's applaud the people working in medium and smaller markets. Those stations not owned by major companies are holding their own and keeping radio revenues from tanking at a much faster rate than the reported 11% drop between August 2007 and August 2008. There are many small to medium market stations that still serve the community and are not chasing the digital dollar. That's fine, as long as the programming is local and community-centric.
To get going, mark down this keyword uttered by CBS Radio's Dan Mason: "engagement." A quick check at Dictionary.com shows how "engagement" is another nebulous word that radio should avoid, or start using examples to explain its use. It's not a word that a typical radio watcher would equate with voice tracking, cutting news rooms and staff, or other post-consolidation moves to lift the industry's financial picture.
Peter Smyth, Greater Media CEO, is looking for "integrated solutions." He also points out that "radio moves with you" and that the radio industry is moving with a greater degree of cooperation than at any time in its history.
Clear Channel's John Hogan then stepped up to proclaim that his company is a content company, which is quite a step away from Lowery Mays' 2004 comments in Fortune Magazine: "We're not in the business of providing news and information. We're not in the business of providing well-researched music. We're simply in the business of selling our customers' products."
Jeff Smuylan from Emmis promoted his new Emmis Interactive and his concept of "360" delivery, a Gold Star should be awarded to this group. Then there's the Emmis based initiatative of putting a radio tuner in every cell phone. An excellent concept, if started in 2002. You'll find this a near impossible task now that the cell companies know they have a lock on youth.
Then we heard from Farid Suleman, CEO of Citadel Broadcasting, who suggested "raising [advertising] rates 20%" - which was about as intelligent a thing as he said. So we'll drop his other comments from this discussion because, like his input into Citadel's operation and its resulting stock price, they added nothing.
Now you might be expecting that the audience these people were talking to was primarily media buyers (with this being held during Advertising Week). But it appeared through numerous comments made that the audience was more like a get-together of New York City radio account executives. Strange that this group of CEOs would be gathering to spur on the troops instead of convincing advertisers to keep advertising money with (or move it to) radio.
So this doesn't become a rendering the length of "War and Peace," let me explain that what's above covers approximately the first 18 minutes of this 58-minute panel discussion. What follows is a summary of the remaining time. If you download the audio from this page, you'll be able to go directly to these marker points in the discussion and catch exactly what each panelist said.
At 19:30 in, John Hogan mentions that what radio suffers from is not a "consumption problem but a perception problem." At no time here, or farther into this exchange, does John Hogan speak of a content problem, which is what those who these executives now call "purveyors of negativity" have been claiming since consolidation started the firing of thousands of creative programmers, talent, and production directors. It's curious to note that Jeff Smuylan used the same "This is a problem of perception, not consumption." phrase in an interview with the Indianapolis Business Journal.
About 24:00 in, Dan Mason brought up how agency creative types are not known for wanting to write radio commercial copy. Unfortunately, he did not go into how radio copy is not being written well within the walls of radio stations, either.
Mr. Mason did start to extol the virtues of the "minute-by-minute accounting of the online radio audience." If anyone is wondering why CBS is moving faster into the online radio world than anyone else, it's because Dan Mason understands how important this has become.
There is approximately another half-hour of conversation that reflects what you'd expect to hear from a group of CEOs who are just now understanding how bad they've let radio get. (It's analogous to the Wall Street bigwigs who claim they didn't see the bust coming.) We can't go over all of it here.
But, we can leave you with these two tidbits of information that I found particularly intriguing.
1) John Hogan used the formation of Clear Channel traffic reports as an example of his company walking new ground. Inadvertantly, it's also a great example of how Clear Channel has continued to degrade the quality of programs delivered. Here's my take. Before Clear Channel Total Traffic Network, traffic reports outside of drive time - and, in some cases midday - were extremely rare. After CC started offering Total Traffic reports, we're now hearing traffic at 2am on a Sunday morning in Cleveland, Ohio. That's a time when there are more people in the local CC studios than on the roads in this town.
Programming played when it doesn't belong is as bad as bad programs played at other times. It drives audience away. Thanks to Clear Channel's ownership of this Total Traffic Network, traffic reports are now played whether a market needs them or not.
2) The last item of interest was very telling, whether anyone on this panel would admit it or not. It's really the most telling point about the radio industry that you'll find within this conversation and, certainly, the most blatant example of what's not hot.
In this entire 58 minutes of discussion with five of the most powerful CEOs in radio, the term HD Radio only showed up once - at 32 minutes into the conversation. It was as a side mention to another topic being discussed (navigation systems).
HD Radio is not considered part of radio's future, at least as it was demonstrated by this panel in talking about "the status & future of radio advertising."
That's one step in the right direction.
|
|
|
From: Dash
Regarding overnight traffic reports: While it is important in LA, in most other markets it is needed to fill time created by 'Less is More.'
With restrictions on commercials, promos, etc., and the content provided, especially by syndicated programming which also has a specific limited time, it still left time to fill in an ordinary hour. Stations covered it by adding elements such as news and traffic programming. No other choice. |
 |
|
From: Greg S.
'NAB Radio Show Report' September 22nd, 2008
'There was continued top-down advocacy of HD Radio from David Rehr, but little support from attendees, and even small signs of revolt on the subject. It was good to see the clear disconnect on this issue, as it is forcing radio's leaders to look more diligently toward viable solutions that fit the demands of today's consumer, rather than depending on a delegated entity to secure radio's longevity.'
Tinyurl.com
Hopefully, broadcasters are moving away from this dead-horse called HD Radio.
|
|
|
|
Comments may be published.
About
Contact
Indie Artists
Radio Stations
Audience Data
Privacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
